On Wednesday, 4 November, several unrelated stories in Kazakhstan ran into one question: what confirms what was said. Astana’s children’s clubs are arguing with the akimat over whether a child’s attendance can be proved by the child’s face; the head of KMG named the company’s reserves and the period of their depletion; in Zhezkazgan a capsule was laid for an oncology centre with a 22-month deadline; and Kyrgyzstan’s president reminded Gazprom of a promise that is thirteen years old.
The day of 4 November
- 30
heads of clubs came to the Astana akimat - 785 million t
KMG’s oil reserves according to Khasenov - 26 million t
KMG’s annual production according to Khasenov - 29.6 billion tenge
cost of the oncology centre in Zhezkazgan - 23.9 billion tenge
cost of the Sats Theatre renovation - 870,000
people in Otbasy Bank’s queue
Based on the review’s materials
- 30
A face instead of a register entry
The budget pays a club for each child separately, so the state has a legitimate question: did this child come to the class. That is how the pilot project of a single state order for additional education works, running in Astana since 2025, and it allows attendance to be confirmed by electronic means, including QR codes and facial recognition. The akimat explains that the measure is needed against fictitious records and payment for classes that did not take place, and that the equipment in the two private organisations was supplied free.
The club heads who came to the akimat argue not with the check itself but with its price and method. They fear paying for equipment maintenance after two free months, do not understand who will see children’s geolocation, and are afraid of going unpaid for a class that was rescheduled. One of them said that after the equipment was installed a provider lost eight children: parents disliked the very idea. The meeting ended with some participants being taken to the police, and warnings were issued to some.
In essence the dispute is this: confirming attendance becomes a service in its own right, with its own cost, risks and data owner. For now the publications do not answer two questions: who pays for maintenance after the free period, and what the system does with a rescheduled class.
The company’s reserves and the country’s reserves
On the sidelines of the government Askhat Khasenov named KMG’s confirmed reserves: 785 million tonnes, and at 26 million tonnes a year, he said, they would last more than 45 years. The figure is checked by the state reserves commission; in the company’s own reporting the reserves are counted under the international PRMS standard — 724 million tonnes of oil equivalent at the end of 2025. The period depends on the future: Khasenov himself cautioned that 45 years is not a horizon, because exploration continues and reserves are replenished.
What matters is what this figure refers to. These are the company’s own reserves: fields where KMG is the operator and its stakes in joint ventures. The state balance is wider: in December 2023 Khasenov, then vice minister of energy, gave for the whole country 15.5 billion tonnes of geological and 4.4 billion tonnes of recoverable oil reserves, and these include both the largest projects and the fields of other subsoil users. The company’s “45 years” and the country’s “40–45 years” are derived on different bases and at different production, so they should not be compared with each other.
The capsule, the deadline and the estimate
In Zhezkazgan a capsule was laid in the foundation of an oncology centre with 100 beds: 29.6 billion tenge, 22 months and a linear accelerator; there is no radiotherapy in the city now. The director of the regional hospital recalled that in 25 years the region has had no separate oncology dispensary, and a patient said she takes her tests to Karaganda. On such a building site the deadline and the estimate stand in for a promise: until it opens there is nothing to check whether it holds.
The Sats Theatre in Almaty shows how such promises change along the way. Work began in March 2025, handover was planned for June, then July 2026 was named, the cost rose from 21.7 to 23.9 billion tenge, and the theatre will open its doors on 6 November. The opening date is a confirmation too: a theatre renovated since March 2025 finally shows “Puss in Boots” rather than renderings.
A promise thirteen years old
Sadyr Japarov reminded Gazprom that in 2013 Kyrgyzstan sold its gas system for one dollar and received in return an obligation to finance the country’s gasification. According to the president, for two or three years he has been asking the company to fulfil it, otherwise he will take the system back “like Kumtor”. Gazprom Kyrgyzstan cited other figures: gasification rose from 22% in 2014 to 35% in 2020. The gap between these assessments is the subject of the dispute, and the publications contain no independent check of it.
For Kazakhstan this is not someone else’s dispute. The Kyrgyz system is linked with Kazakh flows: Gazprom Kyrgyzstan built the pipeline carrying gas to Almaty region, and QazaqGaz and Gazprom agreed on the transit of Russian gas to Uzbekistan and Kyrgyzstan through Kazakhstan until the end of 2040. What a change of owner would mean for those flows is not stated in the reports, but the question of who will confirm the fulfilment of obligations, and how, concerns the transit country too.
The queue as evidence
The same question stands behind the queue for the women’s mortgage. The 20-billion-tenge limit of the Umai mortgage ran out by 16:00, and industry minister Yersaiyn Nagaspayev acknowledged that too little money had been allocated, with 870,000 people in Otbasy Bank’s queue. We wrote about this story earlier.
What will be checked first
Confirmation closes a dispute only where it can be measured and the checker has leverage. The nearest checks are already scheduled: the Sats Theatre opens tomorrow, and the oncology centre’s deadline will be counted in months. The question of who pays for maintaining biometrics in the clubs remains unanswered for now.
